
(9-28-18) This week, the Treatment Advocacy Center released a study of commitment laws by state, assigning each a letter grade. I will provide highlights of that report in a bit but first a personal story.
I rushed my adult son to a local emergency room when he was having a psychotic break but was told to leave after four hours because the doctor said my son didn’t pose an “imminent danger” to himself or others.
Forty-eight hours later, my son broke into a stranger’s unoccupied house to take a bubble bath and was arrested. He was charged with two felonies – breaking and entering and destruction of property.
Ever since my son’s arrest, I have spoken out against the “imminent danger” criteria. I consider it a fools’ standard. No one can accurately predict dangerousness.
This doesn’t mean that I am against safeguards.
I simply believe waiting until someone becomes dangerous is a recipe for disaster. Our misguided “dangerous” standard contributes to psychotic individuals remaining homeless on our streets, being arrested, and being incarcerated. In certain instances, it has played a key role in mass murders, including the shootings at Virginia Tech and in Tucson.






