Search Results for: violence

Insane Consequences: D J Jaffe’s Attempt To Turn A Spotlight On The Seriously Mentally Ill

BannerAd(5-1-17) Given the ongoing dispute about who will be the first Assistant Secretary for mental health and substance abuse, it seems a fitting time to discuss D.J. Jaffe’s new book, Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails The Mentally Ill.

For the past thirty years, Jaffe has been deeply involved in advocating for better care for the seriously mentally ill and his book provides a roadmap for what he is convinced needs to be done to rescue and reform our current system.

Jaffe became an advocate because of a family member. In his case, it was his wife’s younger sister, Lynn. What happened to Jaffe, his wife, Rose, and to Lynn has become an all too common story.

She started becoming paranoid, convinced that conversations taking place across the street involved plots to kill her…We took her to the emergency room. She was admitted, diagnosed, medicated, and provided rehabilitative therapy. But to “protect her privacy,” her doctor wouldn’t tell us her diagnosis, what medication she’d given Lynn, or what would happen when her hospitalization ended. Lynn returned home to us and stopped taking the antipsychotic medications we didn’t even know she’d been prescribed…”

Thus, Jaffe was thrust into our baffling mental health care system which he quickly found to be both frustrating and lacking. Determined to help change it, he began by knocking on the door of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, raising money for its New York City chapter and eventually joining its board. From there, he moved to the Treatment Advocacy Center where he became a strong advocate for Assisted Outpatient Treatment and a dedicated admirer of Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, one of TAC’s founders. More recently, he has launched his own organization, Mental Illness Policy. Org, which he describes as “a nonpartisan think tank that creates detailed policy analyses for legislators, the media and advocates.”

It is his untiring work as a self-admitted policy wonk that has made him a favorite of reporters eager to have someone explain or react to the newest unintelligible legislation that is churning its way through either a state or federal legislative body. Most recently, he worked closely with Rep. Tim Murphy (R. Pa.) and his staff in developing the Helping Families In Mental Health Crisis Act, which is designed to shift federal dollars away from what often are called “wellness” programs and focus on “the seriously mentally ill.” But let’s allow him to explain:

“America’s mental health system is insane, expensive, and ineffective. Under the guise of protecting civil rights, it is killing people. Under the guise of increasing freedom, it is increasing incarceration. Under the guise of facilitating recovery, it ensures that fewer recover. In the name of protecting privacy, it causes suicide. America treats the least seriously ill (“the worried well”) and forces the most seriously ill to fend for themselves. The ability to get help has become inversely related to need. We move sick people from hospitals to jails and label it progress. Government funds those who create the problems rather than those with solutions. The more dysfunctional the system becomes, the more money we throw at it. Our mental health system is not based on science and has nothing to do with compassion. As a result, there are ten times more people with mental illness incarcerated as hospitalized. Being mentally ill has essentially become a crime.” 

Click to continue…

WSJ Reporter Writes Murphy Is Backing Welner For Top Mental Health Post

murphy and welner

Congressman Tim Murphy and Dr. Michael Welner confer at hearing.

(4-19-17) This story in today’s Wall Street Journal by Michelle Hackman supports what I reported in a  blog last month about efforts by Republican Pennsylvania Representative Tim Murphy to get Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price and the White House to appoint Dr. Michael Welner as the first Assistant Secretary for mental health. Whether this appointment will really happen, however, is still anyone’s guess given the oftentimes erratic temperament of the White House.

Trump’s Latest Pick for Mental-Health Post Has Helped Prosecutors Secure Convictions

Forensic psychiatrist Michael Welner has testified in high-profile cases; on television, he has called killers ‘alienated losers’

By Michelle Hackman  published in The Wall Street Journal. 

WASHINGTON—The Trump administration is struggling to fill a top mental-health post, a job created last year to coordinate the efforts of far-flung federal agencies.

The assistant secretary position in the Department of Health and Human Services was first offered to a Florida judge, but the offer was withdrawn due to his lack of a medical background, according to people familiar with the matter. A second candidate had broad support but pulled out.

Now a leading contender is Michael Welner, a forensic psychiatrist who has testified for the prosecution in numerous high-profile criminal cases, according to a half-dozen people familiar with the process including Dr. Welner himself. He faces opposition for some controversial positions.
Click to continue…

“I’m begging you as a mother, if she comes in, please don’t sell her a gun.”

guns

(3-8-17) I don’t like simply reprinting articles, but sometimes I read a story that needs to be widely shared. My former employer has published two such pieces this week. Here’s the first of two.

A warning, a gun sale and tragic consequences – Despite a mother’s plea, her mentally ill daughter was sold a firearm.

Ann E. Marimow in The Washington Post – 3-7-17 Photos by Christopher Smith

Wellington, Mo.

She called the police. Then ATF. After that, the FBI.

Janet Delana was desperate to stop her mentally ill adult daughter from buying another handgun.

Finally, Delana called the gun shop a few miles from her home, the one that had sold her daughter a black Hi-Point pistol a month earlier when her last disability check had arrived.

The next check was coming.

Delana pleaded.

Her daughter had been in and out of mental hospitals, she told the store manager, and was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. She had tried to kill herself. Her father had taken away the other gun, but Delana worried that her daughter would go back.

“I’m begging you,” Delana said through tears. “I’m begging you as a mother, if she comes in, please don’t sell her a gun.”

Click to continue…

Top Peer Hired In Fairfax County: Police Panel Also Gets Members With Mental Health Experience

protests

(3-1-17)  There’s promising news to report in Fairfax County, Va., where I live. Two peers have been appointed to important jobs and individuals familiar with mental illnesses have been named to serve on a panel that will review complaints about police actions.

Peer Jobs Filled

The Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board, which oversees mental health care, announced it has hired a Director of Consumer and Family Affairs, a management job specifically created to be held by a peer. That position has gone unfilled since the end of 2015 when David Mangano retired.

Facing budget cuts, Tisha Deeghan, the CSB executive director, initially had hoped to save money by dividing Mangano’s responsibilities among her top staff. But that move upset peers because none of those managers had lived experiences with mental illnesses. Peers argued that they needed one of their own in management, in part, because of the unusual nature of their jobs. Peer specialists often receive services from the CSB while working for it. That can put them in an uncomfortable position when they feel obligated to advocate for their clients against CSB decisions.  (The controversy about filling Mangano’s position ruptured feelings in the peer community, as evidenced by a still ongoing personnel dispute between CSB management and long-time peer advocate Gina Hayes.)

Director Deeghan said the CSB had hired Mark Blackwell to fill the county’s top peer job.

Click to continue…

Dr. Hanson Offers A Different View About Mass Murders & The Dangerous Criteria

lauderdale

Officers help evacuate airport passengers during mass shooting at Fort Lauderdale airport that killed five. (Photo courtesy of Daily News) 

(1-8-17) Not everyone agreed with my grim Monday blog about mass murders and my blaming of the dangerous criteria that often is used in deciding who can buy and possess a firearm or be involuntarily admitted into a hospital. Among those with a different point of view was Dr. Annette Hanson, co-author of the book, COMMITTED, The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care.  Dr. Hanson is an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. She also is a coauthor of Shrink Rap: Three Psychiatrist Discuss Their Work, and she contributes to a blog by that same name.)

Mass Shootings, Mental Illness, and Public Safety

By Dr. Annette Hanson

Would changing the legal definition of dangerousness for involuntary treatment prevent mass shootings?

In a word, no.

A mass shooting, which is commonly defined as the killing of four victims in a public place, is a relatively rare event.

In 2012, the year with the highest number of mass shootings, there were only seven incidents. Our ability to predict such rare events is tenuous at best. Prediction could be improved if the pool of all potential shooters could be narrowed down a bit, but to date no useful “profile” or typical characteristics of a mass shooter have ever been identified. While some mass shooters have had contact with mental health care prior to their crimes, as many as thirty percent have had no mental health history whatsoever. The strongest consistent characteristic of a mass shooter is male gender, but public gun policy based on gender is obviously impractical.

Even for perpetrators with a history of mental health treatment, changing the legal definition of dangerousness for civil commitment does not help clinicians decide who should or should not be admitted against their will.

Click to continue…

Another Mass Murder With Plenty Of Warning Signs: We Need To Address The Dangerous Criteria

lauderdale shooter

(1-16-17) Twenty four days after President Barack Obama signed into law what was billed as the most major mental health reform bill in decades, a gunman pulled a semi-automatic pistol from his checked luggage in the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport and began shooting, murdering five and injuring six others.

It is fair to ask if any of the reforms in the mental health bills that were merged into the 21st Century Cures Act would have stopped Esteban Santiago-Ruiz from committing murder.

Sadly, I believe the answer is no.

Yes, the Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act, the Mental Health and Safe Communities Act, and the Mental Health Reform Act, included promising initiatives. The bills call for better law enforcement training, more support for early identification and intervention programs, greater use of Assertive Community Treatment, more peer provided services, additional funds for community mental health programs and for continued funding for Assisted Outpatient Treatment.

Having police officers who have been Crisis Intervention Team trained can intercede and stop violence, having peers available to help persons with mental illnesses who encounter the police can help stop violence, access to better services can stop violence, and outpatient treatment can stop violence.

But none of these programs can make a difference if the person who is sick either doesn’t believe he/she is ill or rejects help. Whether by persuasion or coercion, there is no legal way in America today to stop a mentally distributed individual from buying or owning a gun unless they are or have been ruled a danger to themselves or others, or previously hospitalized.

Click to continue…